Tyck till om SwePub Sök
här!
Search: swepub
> Örebro University
> Grönlund Åke 1954
> Peer-reviewed
> Zuiderwijk Anneke >
Benchmarks for eval...
Benchmarks for evaluating the progress of open data adoption : usage, limitations, and lessons learnt
-
- Susha, Iryna, 1986- (author)
- Örebro universitet,Handelshögskolan vid Örebro Universitet,Informatics
-
- Zuiderwijk, Anneke (author)
- Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
-
- Janssen, Marijn (author)
- Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
-
show more...
-
- Grönlund, Åke, 1954- (author)
- Örebro universitet,Handelshögskolan vid Örebro Universitet,Informatics
-
show less...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2014-12-01
- 2015
- English.
-
In: Social science computer review. - : SAGE Publications. - 0894-4393 .- 1552-8286. ; 33:5, s. 613-630
- Related links:
-
https://repository.t...
-
show more...
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
show less...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- Public organizations release their data for use by the public to open the government. Various benchmarks for evaluating the progress of open data adoption have emerged recently. In order to help bring about a better understanding of the common and differentiating elements in open data benchmarks and to identify the methodologies and metrics affecting their variation, this article compares open data benchmarks and describes lessons learned from their analysis. An interpretive meta-analysis approach was used and five benchmarks were compared with regard to metadata (key concepts, themes, and metaphors), meta-methods (methodologies underlying the benchmarks) and metatheories (theoretical assumptions at the foundation of the benchmarks). It was found that each benchmark has its strengths and weaknesses and is applicable in specific situations. Since the open data benchmarks have a different scope and focus and use different methodologies, they produce different results in terms of country ranks. There is an obvious gap in both the literature and benchmarks regarding the evolution of end-user practices and individual adoption of open data. Furthermore, lessons are drawn for the development of more comprehensive open data benchmarks and open government evaluation in general.
Subject headings
- NATURVETENSKAP -- Data- och informationsvetenskap -- Systemvetenskap, informationssystem och informatik (hsv//swe)
- NATURAL SCIENCES -- Computer and Information Sciences -- Information Systems (hsv//eng)
Keyword
- open data
- maturity
- adoption
- benchmark
- index
- open government
- evaluation
- ranking
- open data models
- Informatics
- Informatik
Publication and Content Type
- ref (subject category)
- art (subject category)
Find in a library
To the university's database